Application denied
Regional zoning authority rejects new regional development project.
Following a thorough two-day review, the District Oversight for General Establishments (DOGE) of the Mediterranean Authority for Ground Assessments (MAGA) on behalf of the Bureau of Development Standards (BDS) regrets to inform Real-Estate-in-Chief DBA United States Government FBO messianic skullduggery of genocidal imperialist proportions that his application to redevelop a critical coastal area of the Fertile Crescent Region has been denied.
Unfortunately, the application represents a massive zoning violation as stipulated by, inter alia, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the Rome Statute. The application fails to incorporate the statutory public comment period and, above all else, fails to meet the minimum requirements for ingress/egress configuration to satisfy Level of Service (LOS) criteria.
Long-standing zoning ordinances require, inter alia, real estate development applications to include, inter alia, mixed-use property plans that ensure adequate access for existing residents, including open and green space and suitable health and other public services. Additionally, redevelopment project applications are expected to contain an explicit and detailed account of the cause(s) of said redevelopment needs. This stipulation is of particular importance when the cause happens to be standing next to you when you apply.
Given applicant Real-Estate-in-Chief’s history of eviction and neighborhood “clean-ups” operations, DOGE has concluded that approving his most recent application would be the literal, albeit hackneyed definition of insanity. DBA United States Government FBO messianic skullduggery of genocidal imperialist proportions raises further concerns, in light of DOGE board members having read a history book.
In its formal assessment, submitted to MAGA and forwarded via interagency protocol to BDS, DOGE notes the recent, told-you-so failure of another questionable development project that nonetheless received reluctant approval for the same area. As a result of this maritime misadventure, subsequent applications of a related nature are now subject to a more intensive review.
Denial is further grounded in the project’s involvement of, or association with global fugitives and known criminals, including applicant Real-Estate-in-Chief himself and FBO shareholder. These individuals, and their relevant institutions, present unavoidable conflict-of-interest concerns and would jeopardize the project from the get-go. Indeed, they already have.
The application may be resubmitted for reconsideration following the statutory 120-day cooling-off period and provided it reflects a good-faith effort to achieve substantially different aims — nor call itself the Abraham Accords II.